Economic Legacies and Contemporary Relations
The Architecture of Dependency
The economic relationships established during colonialism did not end with independence. Instead, they evolved into sophisticated systems maintaining African economic dependence on France while ensuring French access to resources and markets.
The CFA franc exemplifies this continuity. Created in 1945, this currency survived decolonization and continues governing fourteen African countries' monetary policy. Senegalese economist Felwine Sarr explains: "The CFA franc is an anachronism, a colonial currency in a post-colonial world. It provides stability at the cost of sovereignty, preventing African countries from using monetary policy for development."
The system requires member states to deposit 50% of foreign reserves with the French Treasury, limits their borrowing capacity, and ensures the French government holds veto power over major decisions. While defenders cite low inflation and convertibility benefits, critics point to restricted growth and continued dependency.
Resource Extraction 2.0
French companies maintain dominant positions in extracting African resources, from uranium in Niger to oil in Gabon. These arrangements, often negotiated during independence, ensure French energy security while providing minimal benefits to local populations.
Areva's (now Orano) uranium operations in Niger illustrate this dynamic. While Niger's uranium powered French nuclear plants for decades, the country remains among the world's poorest. Only 19% of Nigeriens have electricity access, while France derives 70% of its electricity from nuclear power.
Nigerian economist Hippolyte Fofack observes: "The colonial economy extracted raw materials for processing in Europe. Today's arrangement is identical - African countries export crude oil and import refined petroleum, export cocoa beans and import chocolate. Value addition, jobs, and profits remain in the former colonial power."
The Debt Trap
Many former colonies inherited debt from colonial administrations, then accumulated more through development loans often tied to French companies. Structural adjustment programs in the 1980s-90s deepened dependency, forcing privatization that often benefited French corporations.
Thomas Sankara's position on debt remains influential: "We cannot repay the debt because we are not responsible for it. Those who lent us money are those who colonized us. They are the ones who managed our states and economies. The debt is neo-colonialism."
Contemporary initiatives like debt relief come with conditions maintaining economic orthodoxy. Meanwhile, capital flight from Africa to Europe, often through French banks, exceeds aid flows, revealing who truly benefits from current arrangements.
Trade Imbalances
France maintains privileged trade relationships with former colonies through various agreements. While promoted as "partnership," these deals often lock African countries into exporting raw materials and importing manufactured goods, reproducing colonial trade patterns.
The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) between the EU and African countries exemplify this issue. Burkinabé economist Séna Kwaku Agbodjinou notes: "These agreements prevent infant industry protection while flooding our markets with subsidized European products. How can Senegalese tomato farmers compete with Italian tomato paste dumped below production cost?"
French Corporate Dominance
Major French corporations dominate key sectors across francophone Africa:
- Telecoms: Orange controls significant market share across West Africa - Banking: BNP Paribas, Société Générale operate extensive networks - Retail: Carrefour expands while local retailers struggle - Construction: Bouygues, Vinci win major infrastructure contracts - Transport: Air France maintains hub dominance; Bolloré controls ports
This dominance limits local entrepreneurship and ensures profits flow to France. Ivorian businessman Tidjane Thiam observes: "French companies enjoy privileges - political connections, financial advantages, regulatory favoritism - that African businesses cannot match. This is not free market competition but structured inequality."
The Diaspora Economy
Remittances from African diasporas in France represent crucial economic flows. The World Bank estimates African migrants in France send over €10 billion annually to home countries, exceeding French development aid.
These transfers support families, fund small businesses, and provide social safety nets where states fail. Malian sociologist Mamadou Konaté notes: "Migration is our structural adjustment program. Where the state cannot provide healthcare, education, or pensions, migrants fill the gap."
Yet France imposes high transfer fees and scrutinizes these flows for "terrorism financing," adding costs and complications to family support systems.
Development Aid: Tool or Trap?
French development aid to former colonies totals approximately €5 billion annually, but critics question its effectiveness and motives. Much aid is "tied," requiring recipients to purchase French goods or services, effectively subsidizing French companies.
Congolese economist Noël Magloire Ndoba argues: "French aid creates more dependency than development. It funds French consultants, French companies, French NGOs. What remains for actual development is minimal, while the political leverage it provides France is maximal."
Recent reforms promised to "modernize" French aid, but fundamental structures remain unchanged. Aid continues flowing primarily to countries maintaining close French ties rather than those with greatest needs.
The FCFA Digital Future
As Africa embraces digital finance, the CFA franc's limitations become more apparent. Mobile money innovations like Kenya's M-Pesa struggle to expand in CFA zone due to currency restrictions. Meanwhile, France pushes for CFA digitalization that would maintain its control while appearing modern.
Togolese tech entrepreneur Sename Koffi warns: "Digital colonialism threatens to replace traditional colonialism. France wants to control our digital payment systems like it controls our currency. We need technological sovereignty, not digital dependency."
China's Challenge
China's growing African presence challenges French economic dominance. Chinese companies offer infrastructure funding without political conditions, contrasting with French tied aid. This competition forces France to adapt, though often by tightening control rather than offering better terms.
Cameroonian economist Célestin Monga observes: "China's arrival gives African countries options they never had. France must now compete rather than dictate. This could benefit Africa if we play it wisely, avoiding replacing one dependency with another."
Climate Colonialism
As climate change impacts intensify, new forms of economic extraction emerge. Carbon credit schemes often benefit European companies while restricting African land use. France promotes nuclear power as clean energy while its uranium extraction devastates Nigerien environments.
Kenyan environmental activist Wanjira Mathai argues: "Climate colonialism repeats historical patterns - Africa bears costs while Europe reaps benefits. We're told not to develop because of emissions while France's per capita emissions dwarf ours. This is environmental apartheid."
Resistance and Alternatives
Despite structural constraints, African countries increasingly assert economic sovereignty. Rwanda's dramatic pivot from francophone to anglophone orientation demonstrates possibilities. The African Continental Free Trade Area promises to reduce dependency on European markets.
Young entrepreneurs across francophone Africa create innovations despite obstacles. From Senegal's tech startups to Ivory Coast's cashew processing initiatives, new generations refuse accepting inherited limitations.
Beninese economist Lionel Zinsou concludes: "Economic decolonization remains unfinished business. Breaking dependency requires political will, regional integration, and new development models prioritizing African needs over French interests. The resources exist; what's needed is sovereignty to use them."
---